Signal
Connections reform — end-to-end deliverability becomes the gate
Ofgem’s end-to-end review signals a shift from queue position to deliverability evidence. For large loads and generation projects, ‘time-to-connect’ becomes a governance issue, not a planning assumption.
Reader guide
How to read this Signal
Evidence → Uncertainty → Trigger → Decision implication
Each Signal separates the sourced change from what remains uncertain, identifies the trigger to watch and states why it matters to a decision.
See the full Approach →Decision-relevant statements
Key points
What the evidence indicates for the decision.
- →Deliverability criteria (land rights, financing, planning, milestones) are increasingly used to re-order queues.
- →Projects that treat connection dates as ‘given’ risk material re-baselining late in delivery.
- →Counterparty diligence should check connection strategy and evidence trail.
Control
Actions
Practical next steps if this Signal touches your mandate.
- 01Add a ‘connection deliverability evidence’ appendix to major project dossiers.
- 02Re-score delivery risk where connection strategy relies on speculative queue assumptions.
Source record
Sources and evidence
Publication and access dates are shown with the source record.
- 01Ofgem — Connections reform: End-to-end review — Published: n/a • Accessed: 12 December 2025
Decision brief
Discuss how this affects your decision
We can pressure-test assumptions and map the next verification steps.