Approach
Decision-led, evidence-weighted.
Cipher’s approach prioritises what changes the decision. Evidence is weighted, uncertainty is stated, and residual risk is converted into controls rather than ignored.
Want a scoped plan for your case?
Send the decision, entities, jurisdictions and timebox. We respond with a proportionate plan and first gate.
The loop (why it holds)
Evidence can force scope narrowing, identity disambiguation, or a risk-control pivot. This is designed to remain defensible under constraint.
Engagement shape
A loop, not a line
Each phase produces an artefact. The loop is deliberate: evidence can force scope narrowing, identity disambiguation, or a risk-control pivot.
Pivots allowed
01
GateDefine the decision
State what you are deciding, what would change the decision, and what cannot be assumed.
Output: Scope + acceptance thresholds
02
AccuracyAnchor identity
Collect identifiers early to prevent misattribution and homonym errors.
Output: Identity anchors + exclusions
03
DefensibleWeight evidence
Triangulate sources and weight them; label uncertainty plainly where evidence conflicts.
Output: Confidence tiers + limits
04
Non-binaryConvert residual risk into controls
Where uncertainty remains, define controls, triggers and ownership so decisions can still progress.
Output: Controls + monitoring triggers
Where constraints are tight, we prioritise the checks that change the decision, not the checks that merely add detail.
Evidence weighting
A compact rubric: what carries most weight, what is supplementary, and what is lead-only.
Evidence rubric
Evidence strength and why it matters
We weight sources explicitly. High-confidence anchors reduce false positives and prevent implied certainty.
| Tier | Strength | Typical use | Failure mode to avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Authoritative | High | Identity anchors; legal status; registries; enforcement outcomes. | Treating absence as proof; stale filings misread as current. |
| Tier 2 — Owner-published | Med | Context, claims to validate, product/service descriptions; directional signals. | Self-serving assertions; unverifiable metrics; selective disclosure. |
| Tier 3 — Reputable media | Med | Chronology, attribution, corroboration; pressure-testing narratives and timelines. | Headline bias; republishing without updates; attribution drift. |
| Tier 4 — Self-published / aggregators | Low | Lead generation only; used to target primary checks and disambiguation pivots. | Amplification of errors; circular citations; impersonation/spoofing exposure. |